top of page

The Peter Principle


The Peter Principle is a concept that was formulated by Dr. Laurence J. Peter. The principle states that in a hierarchical organization, employees tend to rise to their level of incompetence. Individuals within an organization are often promoted based on their performance in their current roles rather than their ability to perform well in the new, more complex roles to which they are promoted. People are promoted until they reach a position where they are no longer competent, at which point they remain in that role, unable to perform effectively. This leads to inefficiencies, decreased productivity, and a lack of expertise in critical positions within the organization.


I have seen this firsthand. A teacher promoted to school principal. A nonprofit board president promoted to chief executive officer at the organization. Neither performed well in the new role. In each case, the organization lost many employees after the new appointment that filled the leadership position. One experience a quit rate of more than 42% of their employees within a couple years after the incompetent employee was promoted to their new leadership role.


Here are ways to overcome the Peter Principle:

  1. Training and Development: Invest in ongoing training and development programs to enhance employees' skills and capabilities. This helps individuals acquire the necessary skills for their new roles and reduce the risk of being promoted beyond their competency level.

  2. Transparent Promotion Criteria: Define criteria for promotion based on skills, experience, and the potential for future roles. This ensures that promotions are based on merit and competency rather than on past performance.

  3. Assessment and Evaluation: Implement regular performance assessments that provide objective feedback on an individual's strengths and areas for improvement. This information also guides decisions about promotions.

  4. Trial Periods: Consider implementing trial periods or temporary assignments for employees in new roles before making the promotion permanent. This allows for a period of adjustment and evaluation before committing to a long-term decision.

  5. Mentoring and Coaching: Mentors can help individuals develop new skills and navigate challenges effectively as they transition into new roles.

  6. 360-Degree Feedback: Gather feedback from peers, subordinates, and supervisors to gain a comprehensive view of an individual's performance and potential. This will identify where improvement is needed before promotion.

  7. Job Rotation: Encourage job rotation within the organization so employees experience different functions and roles. This helps individuals gain a broader perspective and develop a diverse skill set.

  8. Promotion Delays: Avoid hasty promotions by allowing employees to spend an adequate amount of time mastering their current role before moving on to a new one. This ensures they have the necessary experiences and skills for the next level.

  9. Open Communication: Foster open communications where employees are comfortable discussing their career aspirations, concerns, and development needs. This helps align their goals with the organization's objectives.

  10. Succession Planning: Develop a robust succession planning strategy that identifies and prepares candidates for higher-level roles well in advance. This reduces the likelihood of promoting individuals who might not be ready for the responsibilities.

  11. Continuous Learning: Encourage continuous learning and improvement within the organization. This helps employees to be adaptable and up-to-date with evolving job requirements.

  12. Redesigning Roles: Consider restructuring job roles and responsibilities to match employees' strengths and competencies. This will reduce the risk of promoting individuals beyond their capabilities.


The Peter Principle can be avoided. It requires a combination of thoughtful management practices and a commitment to employee development. Make competency-based promotions. Invest in your employees' growth. It’s more likely the organization will avoid the negative consequences of the Peter Principle.

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
    bottom of page